<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LCD vs Plasma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.earnbyaclick.com/blog/technology/lcd-vs-plasma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.earnbyaclick.com/blog/technology/lcd-vs-plasma/</link>
	<description>Get paid to Click</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.earnbyaclick.com/blog/technology/lcd-vs-plasma/#comment-2072</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.earnbyaclick.com/blog/technology/lcd-vs-plasma/#comment-2072</guid>
		<description>That Krillon site does have  a lot of suppliers in my area- pretty cool.  So I see you've decided to go LCD over plasma.  Have you ever considered DLP?  DLP is actually a faster technology than LCD so you never have to worry about motion blur.  This also makes it great for gaming as well as there is no chance for image burn-in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Krillon site does have  a lot of suppliers in my area- pretty cool.  So I see you&#8217;ve decided to go LCD over plasma.  Have you ever considered DLP?  DLP is actually a faster technology than LCD so you never have to worry about motion blur.  This also makes it great for gaming as well as there is no chance for image burn-in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
